Body fat link to bacteria in faeces

The make-up of the bacteria found in human faeces may influence levels of dangerous fat in our bodies, say researchers from King’s College London.

Their analysis of stool samples in a study of more than 3,600 twins found evidence that some of this bacteria is inherited.

What is contained in faeces bacteria could therefore partly explain why obesity passes down through families.

The study is published in Genome Biology.

The research team extracted information from study participants about the human faecal microbiome – the bacteria present in faeces samples – and compared these to six different measures of obesity, including body mass index (BMI) and different types of body fat.
he researchers found the strongest links with visceral fat, where participants with a high diversity of bacteria in their faeces had lower levels of visceral fat.

This type of body fat is bad news because it is stored in the stomach area around important organs such as the liver, pancreas and intestines and is linked with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
More investigation

Dr Michelle Beaumont, lead study author from the department of twin research and genetic epidemiology at King’s College London, said although the study showed a clear link, it was not yet possible to explain why it existed.

One theory is that a lack of variety in faecal bacteria could lead to the domination of high levels of gut microbes which are good at turning carbohydrates into fat.

Dr Beaumont said: “As this was an observational study we cannot say precisely how communities of bacteria in the gut might influence the storage of fat in the body, or whether a different mechanism is involved in weight gain.”

And she indicated more research was needed to investigate how microbes in our guts and in our faeces can influence our health.

But there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that gut bacteria may play a role in obesity.

It is known that at least 50% of human faeces is made up of bacteria shed from the gut.

Dr Beaumont said that eating a broad diet including a variety of different types of food – much like that of the early hunter-gatherers – could increase the diversity of microbes in our faeces.

If the theory that microbes are passed on down the generations is correct, she said they may play an important role in how fat develops around the body and the health risk it presents.

Magnificent Seven tops US box office

The Magnificent Seven has topped the US box office, taking $35m (£27m) on its opening weekend.

The film, which stars Denzel Washington and Chris Pratt, is a remake of the 1960 western film of the same name.

Its closest competitor was animated children’s movie Storks, which debuted at number two with $21.8m (£16.8m).

The two films knocked Tom Hanks’s Sully, which has been top of the box office for the last two weeks, down to number three.
‘Consistency and quality’

The movie, which tells the true story of the 2009 “miracle on the Hudson” emergency plane landing, took $13.8m (£10.7m).

Bridget Jones’s Baby, which sees Renee Zellweger reprise her lead role in the third film in the franchise, was placed fourth with $4.5m (£3.5m).

Documentary film Snowden held its top five position after taking a further $4.1m (£3.2m) over the weekend.

Washington and Hanks ranked as the overwhelming reason audiences went to see The Magnificent Seven and Sully respectively, according to data gathered by comScore, which compiles the figures.

Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst for comScore, said of the two actors: “They are the model of consistency and they are the model of quality.”

“These are guys who can draw a huge audience in any type of movie that they’re in. It’s not like they’re pigeonholed into one kind of franchise.

“Denzel Washington can be part of a genre, the western, that doesn’t exactly have teenagers scrambling to the movie theatre.”

Samsung delays restarting sales of its Galaxy Note 7 in S Korea

The South Korean tech giant was forced to recall some 2.5 million devices globally due to overheating batteries.

Dozens of devices were reported to have caught fire.

The phone was to be back on the shelf on 28 September but is now expected to be available 1 October at the earliest.

On 2 September Samsung had said it would stop selling the phones and offered to replace the ones already sold. The firm also urged people to stop using the device.

The global recall affects 10 markets. In South Korea, some 200,000 customers have already returned their devices with the same number of people still left for the recall, according to Samsung.

Reuters reported that the next markets where the phone will be available for sale again will be Australia and Singapore in October.

On Friday, cabin crew on an Indian passenger aircraft used a fire extinguisher to tackle a smoking older Samsung handset.

The Galaxy Note 2 – a model launched in 2012 – was smouldering and spitting sparks, according to a statement from airline IndiGo.

n the US, regulators have ordered a formal recall of the Note 7, while the country’s Federal Aviation Administration has told airline passengers not to bring the phones on planes unless they keep them turned off and don’t charge them during the flight.

A number of airlines around the globe have also banned the phone from being used or charged on their planes.

The phone was originally launched on 19 August and had been generally well-received by critics and consumers.

The recall comes at a crucial time for Samsung as rival Apple has just released its new iPhone 7.

China slowdown is global economy’s biggest threat, Rogoff says

Ken Rogoff said a calamitous “hard landing” for one of the main engines of global growth could not be ruled out.

“China is going through a big political revolution,” he said.

“And I think the economy is slowing down much more than the official figures show,”

Mr Rogoff added: “If you want to look at a part of the world that has a debt problem look at China. They’ve seen credit fuelled growth and these things don’t go on forever.”
British exposure

Last week, the Bank of International Settlements, the global think tank for central banks, said that China’s credit to GDP “gap” – which analyses the amount of debt in an economy relative to annual growth – stood at 30.1%, increasing fears that China’s economic boom was based on an unstable credit bubble.

The figure was described as “very high by international standards” by the Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England, which will now test British banks’ exposure to a Chinese slowdown.

British banks have $530bn worth of lending and business in China, including Hong Kong. That is about 16% of all foreign assets held by UK banks.
‘A worry’

“Everyone says China’s different, the state owns everything they can control it,” Mr Rogoff, now Professor of Economics at Harvard, said.

“Only to a point. It’s definitely a worry, a hard landing in China.
“We’re having a pretty sharp landing already and I worry about China becoming more of a problem.

“We’ve taken it for granted that whatever Europe’s doing, Japan’s doing – at least China’s moving along and there isn’t really a substitute for China.

“I think India may come along some day but it’s fallen so far behind in size it’s not going to compensate.”
‘Nervous’

Mr Rogoff said that European economies and the US had to ensure they were “on their feet” before any slowdown started to bite.

“The IMF has marked down its forecasts of global growth nine years in a row and certainly the rumour is they’re about to do it again,” he said.

Beyond China, Mr Rogoff said there was a good deal of uncertainty in the world over issues such as whether Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton will win the US presidential election.

He argued it was difficult to judge what Mr Trump would do if he won, and that a victorious Mrs Clinton might have her plans for infrastructure spending, for example, blocked by the Republican House of Representatives.

“I am certainly nervous, probably much more about a Trump victory, just because of not knowing what’s next,” Mr Rogoff said.

“I don’t like the [protectionist] trade policies of either candidate. I think free trade has benefitted the States immensely in its leadership position. So watching as an economist, this has been a painful election.”
Brexit impact

Mr Rogoff said it was unclear what the impact of Brexit would be on the UK economy as it was not yet possible to define the trade model that would be agreed or judge how well the European economy would be performing at the time Britain leaves the European Union.

Despite praising the Bank of England’s pro-active response to the referendum result, Mr Rogoff said that central banks were in an increasingly invidious position.
Monetary policy has its limits – it is not a panacea,” he said.

“It is a little bit the fault of central bankers for allowing themselves to take too much credit when things are good, and [then] getting blamed too much when things are bad.

“But monetary policy doesn’t make an ageing economy young, it doesn’t make an economy which is having little innovation suddenly innovate, it doesn’t make an economy with a Zombie banking sector somehow miraculously healthy.

“I have a concern about monetary policy at the moment – that it is being asked to take on roles that it’s not built for. It is being asked to do helicopter money where you just print money and hand it out to people.

“In Europe, central banks are buying up a significant proportion of the corporate debt market – that’s what you do in China, in India, they’re doing that in Japan also.

“There are all sorts of other pressures and I worry in the long run that central banks are losing their independence.”

Modi has shown no grief over Kashmir killings, says Burhan Wani’s father

One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist. Burhan Wani’s father said just that.

In an interview Muzaffar Wani, a government school teacher, gave to Times of India, he said, “When Bhagat Singh was fighting against the British, they called him a terrorist, but Indians maintained he was a freedom fighter. When the problem of Kashmir will be solved, India will realise Wani was a freedom fighter.”

Muzaffar has lost two sons to violence in Kashmir now, a fact that he bears with courage. “Before Burhan my son Khalid, who is four years elder to him, was killed in April 2015 by the security forces when he’d gone for a picnic. He was tortured to death.”

Police had thought that Khalid had gone to meet Burhan when they picked him.

Burhan Wani who was born in 1994 left his house in 2010 to join the freedom struggle. After this he met him just once or twice. His loss, he adds, is difficult to bear.

“In the last five years, I met him two or three times for just around two or three minutes. The last time was two-and-half years ago. He was always on his own. I am in a government job for my family. He was working for entire J&K.”

But he adds, that the fact that his sons left him was “Allah’s will”.

He maintains that Burhan never killed anyone. “He was only issuing warnings. He wept when eight CRPF men had died.”

As an Indian citizen who feels ignored he has complains with his Prime Minister Modi. “More than 100 people have been killed in Kashmir in the last two months. He hasn’t shown any grief. He only expressed grief over the killing of soldiers.”

Muzaffar thinks that the Uri attack was not carried out by Pakistan.

“How can it be Pakistan? Whoever entered Kashmir after becoming a militant is a Kashmiri. It’s necessary to solve the Kashmir problem. Else, these attacks may happen.”

He also appreciates Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s speech in the United Nations.

Muzaffar, an old man who has suffered the violence in his region longs for peace. We’ve lost so much in the last two months. We want some resolution.”

For his son and daughter who still live with him he hopes they understand the value of peace.

“I am certain Naveed will not [resort to violence]. I would want my daughter Irm Jahan, who is in college, to become a teacher.”

Officials capture Afghan-born man sought in connection with New York, New Jersey bombings

The Afghan immigrant who authorities believe planted bombs in New Jersey and New York this weekend was captured Monday after a dramatic gun battle with police that was sparked when officers found him sleeping in the doorway of a bar.

Officials had launched a dragnet earlier Monday in search of Ahmad Khan Rahami, the 28-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen who was identified as the primary person of interest in the Saturday night blast in New York’s Chelsea neighborhood, an explosion in New Jersey’s Seaside Park on Saturday morning and a foiled bomb attack Sunday night near a train station in Elizabeth, NJ.

The hunt for Rahami turned out to be brief. A bar owner in Linden, NJ spotted a man sleeping in his doorway Monday morning and called police. An officer confronted the man around 10:45 a.m., and soon recognized the person as Rahami, officials said. Rahami pulled out a gun and shot the officer, identifed by the Linden mayor’s office as Angel Padilla, in the abdomen. Padilla was wearing a bulletproof vest.

A second police officer, idenitifed as Investigator Pete Hammer, had a bullet graze his head. Both officers were expected to be okay.

Rahami was shot at least once in the leg and eventually brought down and captured alive, Union County Prosecutor Grace Park said. He was taken to University Hospital in Newark where he underwent surgery, Fox News confirmed.

Rahami was charged late Monday in Union County with five counts of attempted murder of a police officer. He was being held on $5.2 million bail and remained at a hospital. It wasn’t known if Rahami had an attorney, as messages left with phone numbers listed for family members by the Associated Press weren’t returned. Federal charges in the bombings have yet to be filed.

Linden, the city where Rahami was captured, is about four miles from Elizabeth, where Rahami was last known to have lived. The FBI had launched a raid at his apartment, located above a fried chicken restaurant, on Monday morning. Elizabeth is also the city where investigators discovered five suspicious devices — one of which exploded while a bomb squad robot tried to disarm it — near a train station on Sunday night.

“Today I believe we’re going to find out that [the bombing] was influenced by foreign sources,” Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday on “Fox & Friends.”

Two U.S. officials told Reuters on Monday that the bomb plot likely involved several individuals, a revelation that came hours after federal authorities on Sunday night conducted a traffic stop in Brooklyn of a “vehicle of interest” in the bombings.

Officials said Monday that the car was identified after having been at a location associated with Rahami. The individuals in the vehicle were no longer in custody, the FBI said Monday.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio noted during a Monday news conference that authorities weren’t currently searching for any other suspects. The assistant director of the FBI’s field office in New York, William Sweeney Jr., said “there is no indication that there’s a cell” in the area.

Following the Chelsea explosion — which injured 29 people — on West 23rd Street at 8:30 p.m. on Saturday, police found a second, unexploded device four blocks away. The device was described as a pressure cooker with wires and a phone attached. The contraption, which bore a resemblance to the bomb used in the 2013 Boston Marathon attack, was placed in a plastic bag.

Officials said Rahami’s fingerprint was found on the unexploded bomb discovered on West 27th Street. Authorities were still searching for two people who removed that bomb from a duffle bag after it had allegedly been placed on the street by Rahami. The pair placed the device in a plastic bag and then walked off with the duffel bag. Police said the individuals were only considered witnesses.

The Chelsea bombing came 11 hours after a pipe bomb exploded about 80 miles south in a New Jersey garbage can near the route of a charity 5K race. That explosion occurred in Seaside Park, a borough about 60 miles from Elizabeth. No one was injured in that blast. Runners were slated to be near the location of the explosion when it went off, but the race was delayed after an unattended backpack was discovered.

Authorities said the New York and New Jersey bombs used flip phones as detonators. Several media outlets also reported the New York bombs contained shrapnel consisting of ball bearings and BBs.

Local and federal officials said Rahami had not been on law enforcement’s radar before the explosions, and the FBI said they had no knowledge of Rahami receiving any weapons or explosives training overseas.

Is Pakistan cricket heading for another disaster by recalling Salman Butt?

“It’s not hard to make decisions when you know what your values are”. This quote from Roy Disney carries an immensely comprehensive message for all in charge — of course those who possess and regard values.

But the debate on choosing between law and moral values in making key decisions, particularly in our mishmash society, could be a long-winding one since it neither fully and genuinely abides by the laws nor embraces its rich cultural values in letter and spirit.

The alarming rumours about Salman Butt, the disgraced former Test captain, making the national ranks for the forthcoming West Indies ODI series in the UAE are doing the rounds these days.

The southpaw opener himself sounds optimistic, owing to his good form with the bat at the domestic level. However, the Pakistan Cricket Board has been tight-lipped on the subject so far.
The law, of course permits 31-year-old Salman, the convicted spot-fixer of the 2010 Lord’s Test, to be reconsidered for national team selection since he has served the ban handed out to him by a court in the UK and has also completed the rehab process that was made mandatory for him by the PCB before making a return to domestic competitions.

If the speculations regarding Salman’s possible return to the national team hold any substance, then the passionate Pakistan cricket fans who believe in values and clean cricket have every right to ask: where will our cricket end up with?

When Mohammad Amir (after his sentence and rehab procedure ended) was recalled for national duty early this year, it was widely expressed by experts, former players and fans that he, unlike Salman and Mohammad Asif, was the youngest of the tainted trio who fully cooperated with the investigating authorities and therefore deserved a second chance.

But what logic will the PCB come up with now if Salman is selected to represent the country once again?

The big question here is, at what stage should we draw a line to keep the corrupt element out so that our cricket can flourish in a pure, controversy-free environment?
Should the matter — which is of utmost importance to Pakistan cricket’s future — not be dealt with seriousness and a clear vision by the PCB?

What message will the national selection committee led by Inzamam-ul-Haq be giving to thousands of budding youngsters by recalling Salman — that they can indulge in any wrongdoing to fill their coffers overnight and if caught and found guilty, say sorry, accept the penalty and make a safe return to the national ranks?

Moreover, how can Salman who betrayed the country, his own team-mates and tens of millions of cricket fans, by any stretch of imagination become indispensable to Pakistan cricket when there are scores of talented players waiting in the wings to make their mark?

Recent campaigns to scout talent from PSL franchises Lahore Qalandars and Quetta Gladiators have met with tremendous success already as they continue to hold open trials in various regions of Pakistan.

How would these outfits convince thousands of young aspirants to remain honest to the job if a tainted player like Salman somehow makes a return to international cricket?

Many will recall that Salman — perhaps due to his better academic background and communication skills — was chosen to accompany Inzamam-ul-Haq, the then captain, when president George W. Bush appeared for a brief cricket match at the US Embassy ground in Islamabad back in 2006.

That was great exposure for Salman but rather than learning from the unique honour, he unfortunately opted to take the corruption route at Lord’s four years later.

The game of cricket is so much ingrained in Pakistani society that any wrong move by those at the helm is going to affect the entire social fabric in one way or the other.

Misbah-ul-Haq, our dignified and battle-hardened skipper, is proudly going to receive the ICC Test mace in a few days for steering his troops to the top.

At this historic juncture, the talk of calling back Salman who disgraced the game is the last thing one would want to see.

One sincerely hopes that better sense prevails with the PCB and they can avoid this embarrassment that will greatly enhance the reputation of chairman Shaharyar Khan and his board.

Responding to a dangerous time

Pakistan is facing an exceptionally dangerous challenge with aggressive rhetoric and threats from India and Afghanistan and hostile narratives gaining resonance in Washington.

Failing to suppress the sustained uprising in India-held Kashmir, the Modi government has intensified its smear campaign against Pakistan in yet another attempt to portray the Kashmiri protest as Pakistan-inspired terrorism.

Following the attack on the Uri Indian army camp, India may heat up the Line of Control (LoC) to detract attention from its atrocities in the Valley. Pakistan should even be ready for worse.

In this trying situation, Pakistan can rely on diplomatic support from China and friends in the Islamic world. But much depends on our own defence preparedness and our diplomacy. We need to devise a policy response that helps reduce the threat without giving the Kashmiris a feeling of a let-down.

Examine: Pakistan’s foreign policy betrays deep domestic insecurities

First we must address our vitiated relations with Kabul and Washington which have nosedived since the collapse of the quadripartite process.

Regardless of the grave policy errors made since its intervention in Afghanistan, much like those made later in Iraq, Washington has chosen to blame Pakistan for its woes in Afghanistan. Both Washington and Kabul believe that sanctuaries in Pakistan sustain the Afghan Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan.

Our well-intentioned commitment to nudge the Taliban towards reconciliation, bring them to the negotiating table and our apparent eagerness to play a role have turned us into a Taliban accomplice. It is time to rethink our Taliban policy.

We must make a clear policy declaration that Pakistan cannot take any responsibility on behalf of the Afghan Taliban leadership and we would welcome direct contacts between them and the government or any political elements in Kabul for the purpose of reconciliation. We would still be willing to play a role only if specifically requested.

Secondly, we must reaffirm that we will do all we can to prevent use of our territory for militant activities inside Afghanistan and take visible measures for this purpose. This is our responsibility as a state. We cannot justify differentiated emphasis for Operation Zarb-i-Azb which attracts the accusation that we distinguish between “good and bad” Taliban.

The suggested declaration to be made at the highest level, preferably as part of the prime minister’s UNGA address, will be a step in the right direction to bring down temperatures, particularly in our relations with Washington.

We must reflect why is it that Pakistan has ended up always siding with the most regressive elements in Afghanistan, some of whom we falsely regarded as assets, why most educated Afghans have become alienated from us and why we allowed our policy to fall in the insidious Afghan ethnic divide.

We must disavow pretentions of influence with the Taliban leadership. They and before them the Afghan Mujahedin leaders never acceded to our sincere advice for ending the conflict. We must be firm with the likes of the Haqqani group who cannot be allowed to abuse our hospitality.

We must also expedite fencing, consolidating and better managing the border. Promisingly, the government is showing seriousness in integrating Fata with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The perception of Pakistan’s erstwhile support to extremist militancy in Kashmir in the 1990s and our association with the Taliban have hurt Pakistan’s international image.

Of late, the delay in prosecuting especially those implicated in the Mumbai terrorist incident has been misconstrued as weak Pakistani commitment to fighting terrorism, the nemesis of all modern societies. This undermines Pakistan’s ability to forcefully advocate the Kashmir cause.

Nothing will help India more than an evidence of outside militant elements blending with the indigenous Kashmiri uprising to justify its extreme violence in India-held Kashmir and its aggressive posture against Pakistan. We should be open to cooperating with any investigation into the Uri attack.

This is, however, no time to reflect on what happened in the past. The ongoing Kashmiri struggle against repressive Indian rule, demands clear and emphatic expression of solidarity. The prime minister is expected to do so at the UNGA and in his meetings with world leaders.

The uprising in Kashmir is not Pakistan instigated as India claims. Kashmir is the oldest dispute on the agenda of the world body waiting international attention for its resolution.

Above all, it is the Kashmiris and the Kashmiri Diaspora, especially in the United States and the United Kingdom, who must fully mobilise themselves to agitate world conscience to their suffering and the denial of their fundamental rights. They have a vital role to play.

Pakistan should consult Kashmiri leaders from both sides of the LoC and from Diaspora and they must reach out to each other to chart out a course that corresponds to the wishes of the Kashmiri people.

If offered, Pakistan cannot refuse a dialogue with India as the two nuclear-armed neighbours cannot afford a break in communications. However, Kashmiri leaders must be involved with the process for a settlement that ensures peace and enables Kashmiris to be masters of their own affairs and destiny.

Inam ul Haque, Riaz Hussain Khokhar and Riaz Mohammad Khan are former foreign secretaries and retired major general Mahmud Durrani is a former national security adviser.

North Korea’s ground test of rocket engine is ‘a success’

Kim Jong-un, the country’s leader, asked scientists and engineers to make preparations for a satellite launch as soon as possible, KCNA reported.

It is the latest in a series of missile-related tests this year.

Meanwhile, the US and China have agreed to step up co-operation at the UN to address the North’s fifth nuclear test.

The underground nuclear test, conducted earlier this month, is thought to be the country’s most powerful yet.

North Korea regularly makes claims about the progress of its nuclear and missile programmes, but analysts say most of them are impossible to independently verify.

North Korea’s missile programme
Kim Jong-un: North Korea’s supreme commander

US and Chinese officials have started discussions on a possible UN sanctions resolution as a response, unnamed diplomats were quoted by the Reuters news agency as saying.

But Beijing has not said directly whether it will support tougher steps against Pyongyang, the agency added.

China is North Korea’s main ally and trading partner, but has grown increasingly intolerant of its military actions and Kim Jong-un’s aggressive rhetoric.

Its support for toughened sanctions is crucial if they are to have any impact, but Beijing has repeatedly said that such steps are not the ultimate answer for the issue.
‘Successful test’

Kim Jong-un supervised the test at the country’s Sohae satellite-launching site, KCNA reported.

That is where the country launched a rocket in February, reportedly carrying a satellite.

The engine tested would give the country “sufficient carrier capability for launching various kinds of satellites, including Earth observation satellite at a world level”, the report added.

Mr Kim, KCNA said, called for more rocket launches to turn the country into a “possessor of geostationary satellites in a couple of years to come.”

This was seen by observers as an indication that Pyongyang might soon launch another long-range rocket.

The North insists its space programme is purely scientific in nature but the US, South Korea and even China say the rocket launches are aimed at developing inter-continental ballistic missiles.

UN Security Council resolutions ban the state from carrying out any nuclear or ballistic missile tests.

Syrian War : USA is outraged over aid convoy attack

The UN has confirmed that the convoy was hit near the rebel-held town of Urum al-Kubra, without giving details.

Activists say an air strike hit the trucks hours after the army declared a US-Russian brokered truce over.

The US says it will “reassess the future prospects for co-operation” with Russia – an ally of Syria’s government.

“The destination of this convoy was known to the Syrian regime and the Russian Federation,” state department spokesman John Kirby said.

“And yet these aid workers were killed in their attempt to provide relief to the Syrian people,” he added.

  • Children suffer horrors of Syria’s war
  • US unease over joint air action with Russia
  • How will the new truce work?
  • What’s left after five years of war?

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based monitoring group, said the attacks were carried out by either Syrian or Russian aircraft.

It added the dead included the Syrian Arab Red Crescent volunteers and drivers.

The UN aid chief Stephen O’Brien said if the “callous attack” was found to be deliberate it would amount to a war crime.

At least 18 of 31 lorries in the convoy were hit, according to a UN spokesperson. The convoy was intended to deliver aid for 78,000 people in rebel-held areas near Aleppo.

A witness told Reuters news agency by phone that about five missile strikes had hit the lorries, which were parked at a centre belonging to the Syrian Red Crescent.

Save

Save